A Study of Its Tawatur
The Meaning of Hadith alThaqalayn
In each of the parts of the `Abaqat dealing with a
particular hadith, the author, Sayyid Hamid Husayn - quddisa sirruh - after dealing with
its tawatur goes on to deal with the meaning and doctrinal import of the hadith. In fact,
this is the method which he is forced to follow in order to refute the statements of Shah
`Abd al-`Aziz in the Tuhfah regarding the tawatur of the traditions mentioned by him as
well as their doctrinal import.
In the second section of the part of the `Abaqat
dealing with Hadith al-Thaqalayn, Sayyid Hamid Husayn deals with Shah `Abd al`Aziz's
objections, the first of which relates to its transmission and the rest to its doctrinal
impact.
The first objection dealt with is the statement of
Shah `Abd al`Aziz that only Zayd ibn Arqam from among the Prophet's Companions has
narrated the tradition. This objection is met by pointing out that at least thirty-four
Companions have narrated the tradition. The sources which narrate the tradition from each
of them - which were mentioned earlier in this article - are pointed out by him.
Moreover, he points out, Zayd's narration of the
tradition has two lengthier versions as recorded by al-Nasa'i in al-Khasa'is, alHakim in
al-Mustadrak, al-Tabarani and `Ali al-Muttaqi. Moreover, he points that the wording of the
tradition as quoted by Shah `Abd al-`Aziz has not been narrated or recorded by any Sunni
authority on tradition.
The next statement of Shah `Abd al-`Aziz that is
dealt with is his outright denial that Hadith al-Thaqalayn implies the religious
leadership of the Ahl al-Bayt (A). The author points out that since the Prophet (S) has
placed the Ahl al-Bayt (A) by the side of the Qur'an, it means that the Ahl al-Bayt (A)
have to be followed, like the Qur'an, as the living guides of the Ummah in matters of
doctrine, ritual and law. He cites the statements of numerous leading Sunni authorities in
affirmation of this. The author points out that the words 'thaqalayn' and the command to
hold on to them (al-'i`tisam, al-'akhdh or al'ittiba` in accordance with the different
wordings) unambiguously imply that in the same way as it is obligatory to follow the
Qur'an, so also it is equally obligatory to follow the AhI al-Bayt (A) in the matters of
Islamic teachings. Moreover, the inseparability of the Qur'an and the AhI al-Bayt (A), as
well as the repeated emphasis on holding on to the two and the specific emphasis on
adherence to the Ahl al-Bayt (A) and the observance of their rights clearly establish the
obligation to follow the Ahl al-Bayt (A) as the religious leaders, authorities and guides
of the Ummah. The author points out that this interpretation of the Hadith al-Thaqalayn is
also confirmed by some verses of the Holy Qur'an such as:
Say: 'I do not ask of you a wage for this, except love for the kinsfolk.' (42:23)
And halt them, to be questioned. (37:24)
The author cites a number of Sunni scholars, such as
al-Sakhawi in al'Istijlab, al-Suyuti in al-Durr al-manthur (vi, 7), `Abd alWahhab
alBukhari in Tafsir Anwari, al-Khatib al-Sharbini in al-Siraj al-munir (v, 538),
al-Tayyibi in al-Miqat (v, 594), alMunawi in Fayd al-Qadir (iii, 14), al-Zarqani in
Sharh alMawahib (vii, 7) and others, regarding the interpretation of the first verse.
Others, including al-Samhudi, alWahidi, alShaykhani, Mawlawi Wali Allah Lakhnowi, and
Mawlawi Muhammad Mubin, have affirmed that the questioning on the Day of Judgement
referred to in the second verse refers to the attitude of the individual Muslim vis-a-vis
the Prophet's Ahl alBayt (A).
Sayyid Hamid Husayn then goes on to point that
Hadith alThaqalayn also affirms the freedom of the Imams of the Ahl alBayt (A) from
sin and error (`ismah) because: the hadith commands adherence to them and the Qur'an
together and since the Qur'an is free from every trace of falsehood and error, so is the
guidance of the Ahl al-Bayt (A); adherence to the two of them is considered as a guarantee
against misguidance for the Ummah, which is only possible if the Imams of the Ahl al-Bayt
(A) are free from error and sin. This conclusion is also supported by other traditions of
the Holy Prophet (S) in favour of `Ali (A) and the Ahl al-Bayt (A), some of which were
mentioned earlier.
Furthermore, the author points out, the Hadith al-Thaqalayn
implies the preeminence of the Ahl al-Bayt (A)
within the Ummah from the viewpoint of knowledge (a`lamiyyah) and excellence (afdaliyyah).
He cites statements of several non-Shi`i scholars in confirmation of this conclusion.
Moreover, the author states, there are many
traditions which indicate that Hadith al-Thaqalayn and Hadith al-Ghadir were proclaimed by
the Prophet (S) in the course of a single sermon at Ghadir Khumm. Some of these traditions
have been recorded by al-Muttaqi in Kanz al`ummal (i, 167), Ibn Kathir in Ta'rikh (v,
209), al-Sakhawi in al-'Istijlab (MS), al-Samhudi in Jawahir al`iqdayn (MS), Ibn Hajar
in al-Sawa`iq (25) from al-Tabarani and many others.
According to still some other versions of the
narration, Hadith alThaqalayn, Hadith al-Ghadir and Hadith al-Manzilah were mentioned in
the course of the same sermon at Ghadir Khumm as mentioned by Ibn Hajar in al-Fatawa
al-fiqhiyyat al-kubra, ii, 122.
In some versions of the tradition, he points out,
the word 'khalifatayn' (successors) is mentioned instead of 'thaqalayn', as in the
narrations recorded by Ahmad ibn Hanbal in Musnad, v, 181, as well as alTabarani, Ibn
Abi `Asim, Abu Bakr ibn Abi Shaybah, al-Zarqani and others. This word implies rather more
explicitly the Imamah and Khilafah of `Ali ibn Abi Talib (A) and the Ahl al-Bayt (A).
Some versions of the tradition, such as the one
narrated by alQunduzi in Yanabi` al-mawaddah, 20, from al-Hasan ibn `Ali (A), contain
the following statement of the Prophet (S) which signifies the perpetuity of the Imamate:
O God, You don't let the earth remain devoid of Your Proof over Your creation so that Your proofs should not become invalid or that Your friends should go astray after You have guided them. They (the Proofs of God) are few in number but great in worth near God, Almighty and Glorious. Indeed, I had prayed to God, Exalted and Blessed, to place knowledge and wisdom in my descent and the descent of my descendants, and in my seed and the seed of my seed, until the Day of Resurrection, and my prayer was granted.
This closely resembles the following tradition of
Nahj albalaghah (Hikam:147) addressed by `Ali (A) to his pupil Kumayl ibn Ziyad.
...But the earth is never devoid of him who stands for God with a proof (qa'im li'Ilah bi hujjatin). He is either manifest and well-known or afraid and concealed, so that God's proofs and His clear signs should not become invalid. How many are they and where are they? By God, they are few in number, but great in esteem before God. Through them God maintains His proofs and signs till they entrust them to others like themselves and plant them in the hearts of their likes. Knowledge has led them to the reality of understanding and they have attained the spirit of certitude. That which is hard upon the seekers of comforts comes easy to them. They endear what the ignorant regard with aversion. They live in the world with their bodies, but their spirits are in a higher realm. They are the vicegerents (khulafa') of God in His earth and His callers to His Din. Oh, how much I yearn to see them! (H: 147)
This tradition of `Ali (A) has been widely reported
and recorded by Shi`i and non-Shi`i traditionists and historians, including Ibn `Abd
Rabbih in al-`Iqd al-farid, i, 265, 293; al-Ya`qubi in Ta`rikh, ii, 400; al-Harrani in
Tuhaf al-`uqul, 169; al-Saduq in al-Khisal, i, 85 and Ikmal al-Din, 169; Abu Talib
al-Makki in Qut al-qulub, i, 272; al-Khatib alBaghdadi in Ta'rikh Baghdad, vi, 389;
al-Razi in al-Tafsir al-kabir, ii, 192; Ibn `Abd al-Barr in al-Mukhtasar, 29 and Jami`
bayan al-`ilm; al-Khwarazmi in al-Manaqib, 390 and al'Azhari in Tahdhib al-lughah, vi,
70.
To return to the discussion of `Abaqat about the
doctrinal import of Hadith al-Thaqalayn, the author next points out that `Ali (A) referred
to it in the course of his debate with the members of the six-man council (shura)
appointed by `Umar, the second caliph, to select a successor to him. `Ali's arguments
(ihtijaj) before the shura are recorded in detail by Ibn al-Maghazili in his al-Manaqib,
112. Al-Qunduzi in Yanabi` al-mawaddah, 35, also refers to `Ali's reference to Hadith
alThaqalayn in order to establish the incontestability of his claim to successorship of
the Prophet (S).
This tradition was also referred to by al-Hasan ibn
`Ali (A) in his speech delivered after being elected as caliph following `Ali's (A)
martyrdom. Al-Qunduzi, op. cit., 21, 48 483 and Sibt ibn alJawzi in Tadhkirat
alkhawass, 198, have recorded related traditions in their works. Besides the large
number of Companions who have narrated the tradition, reference to it also occurs in a
letter of `Amr ibn al-`As addressed to Mu`awiyah and recorded in al-Khwarazmi's
al-Manaqib, 128 - 130, and in a statement of al-Hasan al-Basri, a well-known Tabi`i saint,
as recorded by Ibn Abi al-Hadid in Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah, iv, 95. All these references
affirm the preeminence of `Ali ibn Abi Talib (A) and the Ahl al-Bayt (A) in the Ummah and
their claim to the comprehensive leadership of the Ummah after the Holy Prophet (S).