man as a social being
No one would deny that men are social beings who co-operate with each
other to better meet their daily needs. We may wonder, however, whether
men desire this co-operation from their natural feelings; are they naturally
inclined to undertake an action with others and share an interest in something
as a social project?
On one level, man's needs, feelings and desires cause him to act for
his own benefit and without regard for the needs and wishes of others.
Man uses every means to fulfil his own needs: he uses every kind of transport
to reach his destination; he uses the leaves, stems and fruit of plants
and trees; he lives upon the meat of animals and their products, and takes
advantage of a multitude of other things to complement his own deficiencies
in certain respects. Can man, whose state is such that he uses everything
he finds to his own ends, be expected to respect another human being? Can
he extend his hand to another in co-operation and turn a blind eye to his
own desire for the sake of mutual benefit?
The answer in the first instance must be no. It is as a result of man's
countless needs, which can never be fulfilled by himself alone, that he
recognizes the possibility of fulfilling them through the help and co-operation
of others. Similarly, he understands that his own strengths, desires and
wishes are also shared by others, and just as he defends his own interests
so others defend theirs.
Thus, out of necessity, he co-operates with the social nexus and gives
a certain measure of his own efforts to fulfill the needs of others; in
return he benefits from the efforts of others in order to full fill his
own needs. In truth he has entered into a market-place of social wealth,
always open to traders and offering all the benefits obtained by the collective
work of the society. All these factors are placed together in this market-
place of pooled human resources and each person, according to the importance
society attaches to his work, has a share in these benefits.
Thus man's first nature incites him to pursue the fulfillment of his
own needs using others in the process and taking advantage of their work
for his own ends. It is only in cases of necessity and helplessness that
he lends a hand to co-operate with society.
This matter is clear when we observe the nature of children: anything
a child wants he demands in an extreme way; he emphasizes his demand by
crying. As he grows older, however, and becomes a part of the social fabric,
he gradually puts an end to his excessive demands. More evidence for the
truth of this may be seen when a person accumulates power which exceeds
that of others and he rejects the spirit of cooperation and its restrictions
of society; such an individual uses people and the fruits of their labours
for himself without giving anything back in return.
God refers to the necessary spirit of natural cooperation in society
in chapter xliii:32, "We have apportioned among them their livelihood
in the life of the world, and raised some of them above others in rank
that some of them take labour from others ... " This verse refers
to the reality of the social situation in which each individual has a different
capacity and different talents: those who are superior in one domain engage
the cooperation or employ of others for their eventual mutual benefit.
Thus all members of society are linked together in the ways and wants
of the fabric of one single social unit. Those who do not see the obvious
necessity of mutual cooperation are condemned by God in chapter XIV:34,
"truly man is surely a wrong-doer, (a tyrant) " and, in chapter
xxxii1:72, "indeed he has proved a tyrant and a fool."
These verses refer to man's natural instinct which, unless checked,
drives him to take advantage of his fellow-men and in doing so to overstep
the rights of others.